
The job involves high safety risksThe building structure is fragile, and manual inspection is prone to collapse and injury; operations in high-altitude and narrow areas pose significant risks of falling and bumping.

Insufficient investigation coverage depthDue to the dense buildings and numerous concealed locations, manual inspection cannot cover all areas. It is impossible to conduct penetrating inspection of the interior of walls, foundations, and other parts, which may easily lead to missed hidden dangers.

Weak data decentralized decision-makingThe monitoring and maintenance data are scattered and there is no unified platform; relying on human experience leads to inaccurate safety assessments, difficult to predict hidden dangers, and a high risk of misjudgment and missed judgments.

The cost of batch governance is highThe dilapidated buildings are large in number and scattered, making manual inspection costly. The lack of precise data for maintenance and reinforcement leads to ineffective investment and high financial pressure.

weak risk underwritingThe hidden dangers of dilapidated buildings are uncertain, and collapse accidents result in huge losses, difficult compensation, and complex responsibilities. Without a risk transfer mechanism, all parties are under great pressure.