
The inspection environment is extremely dangerousThe terrain in disaster-prone areas is steep and the rock and soil are loose. During rainstorm weather, patrols are prone to encounter burial, impact, and injury, posing a high risk of casualties.

The coverage of manual inspection is limitedGeohazard sites are widely distributed and the terrain is complex, which limits the artificial inspection routes and reduces the inspection frequency; deep and concealed hazards are difficult to detect.

Multi-source data cannot be analyzed in a linked mannerVarious relevant data are scattered and lack integrated analysis; relying on manual pre-judgment, early warning lags behind, making it difficult to predict disaster trends.

The operation and maintenance costs in remote areas are highThe disaster-stricken areas are remote, making manual inspection of transportation infrastructure and time-consuming. In severe weather conditions, frequent inspections are required, which are inefficient and require significant investment.

Weak early warning capability for sudden disastersDisasters break out suddenly, and due to the lack of all-weather real-time monitoring, it is difficult to detect anomalies in advance. As a result, early warning and evacuation are not timely, leading to heavy losses.